Pragmatic and Move Analysis in Thai EFL Learners’ Business Correspondence Writing in Hospitality Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v11i2.2825Keywords:
cooperative principle; English for business correspondence; figurative language; hospitality services; move analysisAbstract
This study investigated pragmatic and move analysis in Thai university students’ business correspondence writing in the field of hospitality services. The students joined a pre-experience excursion at a five-star hotel, Graceland Khaolak Beach Resort, as preparation to join internship programs in the field of hospitality. This visit provided them with experiential learning for data collection. The study used purposive sampling. The sample of the study was 112 Thai EFL learners who studied English for Business Correspondence (936-300) in semester 1/2026 at a university in the southern part of Thailand. The data collection consisted of students’ email writing to inform their clients, sent in a given situational context. The instrument was a reply email to their clients asking for information about a hotel booking. The data analysis followed the conceptual framework, including Swales’ move analysis in email writing, Colston’s figurative language, and Grice’s cooperative principle to observe the students’ business correspondence writing. Descriptive statistics were used to support the data analysis. The results of the move analysis showed that the frequent errors in their email writing were found in move 2 and move 4, which were the establishing communication chain and closing moves. In terms of cooperative principles, some students violated the maxim of quality as they could not address specific names of room categories (i.e., deluxe room) to their clients. Most students used simile as a creative meaning device to end their concluding move for creating impression at 22.32 percent. Finally, pedagogical implications for writing emails with assertive speech acts were given. The results of the study would contribute something new to the field in terms of a meaning-making focus in writing business correspondence.
References
Ariyanfar, S. & Mitchell, R. (2020). Teaching writing skills through genre: applying the genre-based approach in Iran. International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 7(1), 242-257. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n1.843
Asztalos, R. (2014). The move structure of confirmation emails: A genre-based investigation of a sub-genre of business emails. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education, 9(3), 201-212.
Bennui, P., & Hashim, A. (2014). Stylistic creativity in Thai English fiction. Asian Englishes, 16(2), 80-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2014.901002
Bhatia, V. K. (2019). World Englishes in professional communication. World Englishes, 38, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12362
Chaisarn, K. (2021). Problem in email writing among Thai staff: A case study at a five-star hotel in Bangkok. Master’s thesis, Thammasat University, Thailand
Cole, R. (2024). Inter-rater reliability methods in qualitative case study research. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(4), 1944-1975. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241231156971
Colston, H. L. (2015). Using Figurative Language. Cambridge University Press.
Coombes, P. H. (2026). Making strategy speak: How figurative language can help business leaders build sustainable competitive advantage. Management and Business Review, 6(1), 24-36.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. D. (1982). Language Two. Oxford University Press
Frankenberg-Garcia, A., Lew, R., Roberts, J. C., Rees, G. P., & Sharma, N. (2019). Developing a writing assistant to help EAP writers with collocations in real time. ReCALL, 31(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000150
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., Hyams, N. M., Amberber, M., Cox, F., & Thornton, R. (2017). An introduction to language. Cengage AU.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.). In Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
Hanh, N. T. T. (2025). Conceptual metaphors to foster students’ vocabulary learning outcomes in English for Business Purposes. Journal of Language and Education, 11(4), 86-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.24828
Hernández, M. S. (2011). Raising student awareness about grammatical and lexical errors via email. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, (14), 263-271.
Hiranburana, K. (2017). Use of English in the Thai workplace. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2015.10.002
Kasper, G. (1992). Pragmatic transfer. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin (Utrecht), 8(3), 203-231.
Kawinvasin, S., Lertchalermtipakoon, P., Pochote, S., & Chinorak, V. (2021). Using genre awareness to enhance business email correspondence among EFL students: Making complaints. Academic and Research Journal of Liberal Arts, 16(1), 45-58.
Kearns, K. (2011). Semantics. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Khruawan, M., Khaourai, P., Sangthakeong, A., & Chanpermpoonpaul, S. (2021). English business email writing problems of 4th year logistics and supply chain management students of the Faculty of Business Administration at Huachiew Chalermprakiet University. Academic and Research Journal of Liberal Arts (Online), 16(1), 59-69.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Laubert, C., & Parlamis, J. (2019). Are You Angry (Happy, Sad) or aren’t You? Emotion detection difficulty in email negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 28(2), 377-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-09611-4
Lazovic, M., & Vicfic, S. (2015). Do we really understand anglicisms used in tourism and hospitality terminology?. Quaestus, (7), 221.
Li, W. (2022). Saying “no” in emails in Mandarin Chinese and Australian English. Journal of Politeness Research, 18(2), 367-402. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2020-0005
Limthaworn, P., & Keyuravong, S. (2017). This customer is complicated and tedious!!!: Investigating maxim flouting and Its functions in business e-mail correspondence. rEFLections, 24, 66-80.
Lingaiah, J., Isai Amutan, K., Mariappan, L., Rabbani, M., Sundram, P., & Jayabalan, N. (2026). Enhancing professional email communication in healthcare using AI and Swales’ move structure: A case study from a Malaysian Private Hospital. Howard Journal of Communications, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2026.2660941
Litvinova, A. V., & Larina, T. V. (2023). Mitigation tools and politeness strategies in invitation refusals: American and Russian communicative cultures. TLC Journal, 7(1), 116-130. doi: 10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-1-116-130
Liu, Y., Nguyen, N. D. D., Nguyen, H. C., & Wannaruk, A. (2025). Rhetorical move structures and politeness strategies employed in request and refusal emails by international students in a Thai ELF context. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2466284
McKeown, J., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Socio-pragmatic influence on opening salutation and closing valediction of British workplace email. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, 92-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.012
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. Taylor & Francis.
Memari, M. (2016). The Types of grammatical metaphors used in native and nonnative request emails. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 4(5), 68-77. https://www.european-science.com/jaelt/article/viewFile/4796/2381
Müller, M., Schurr, C., Etter, N., & Komposch, N. (2025). A guide for preparing and reporting qualitative research. The Professional Geographer, 77(5), 569-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2025.2542817
Park, S., Jeon, J., & Shim, E. (2021). Exploring request emails in English for business purposes: A move analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.006
Patarapongsanti, A., Thongsan, N. C., Sukrutrit, P., Para, C., & Saphanuchart, N. (2022). An analysis of errors in business-oriented written paragraphs of Thai EFL undergraduates. English Language Teaching, 15(7), 136-148.
Pillai, S., & Ong, L. T. (2018). English (es) in Malaysia. Asian Englishes, 20(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1459073
Qashoa, S. H. H. (2014). English writing anxiety: alleviating strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.288
Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and Modernity/ Rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 168-
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., & Jinks, C. (2017). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Shang, H. F. (2007). An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220601118479
Siricharoen, A., & Wijitsopon, R. (2020). A corpus-based comparative study of lexical bundles in authentic and textbook English business emails. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(2), 41-63.
Suraprajit, P. (2021). An analysis of errors in English essays written by Thai non-English major students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1), 12-19.
Sutakote, C., Sarntong, K., & Pawanutra, P. (2025). An analysis of sentence errors in business email writing of Thai EFL students. Journal of Education Studies, Chulalongkorn University. 53(3), 1-16. doi: 10.14456/jescu.2025.22
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tafazoli, D., Nosratzadeh, H., & Hosseini, N. (2014). Computer-mediated corrective feedback in ESP courses: Reducing grammatical errors via Email. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 355-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.341
Ting, Y. S. (2012). E-Newsletter as a marketing tool for hospitality and travel firms to retain customers. African Journal of Business Management, 6(12), 4551-4570.
Wajdi, M., Dizon Jr, R. P., Sahoo, P., Ghafar, Z. N., & Hasan, M. K. (2025). Enhancing professional communication: A study of English business correspondence in international business contexts. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 4(2), 121-132.
Wannaruk, A. (2008). Pragmatic transfer in Thai EFL refusals. RELC journal, 39(3), 318-337.
doi: 10.1177/0033688208096844
Watkhaolarm, P. (2005). Think in Thai, write in English: Thainess in Thai English literature. World Englishes, 24(2), 145-158.
Wicaksono, F. A., Sulistyaningsih, S., & Syakur, A. (2023). A genre-based approach to improve the students’ writing skills. Jurnal Basicedu, 6, 3391-3397.
Yaghubyan, M. (2024). Writing principles of business correspondence. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 20(1), 50-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2024.20.1.50
Zalukhu, A., Sihite, J. E., Hasanah, U., & Cahyani, A. N. (2025). Improving students’ business letter writing through a genre-based approach. Journal of Language Education, Linguistics, and Culture, 5(3), 275-281.
Zhang, Y., Wang, F., & Wannaruk, A. (2019). Pragmatic competence in business context: A case study of Thai EFL university students. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, 13(2), 1-24.
Zhou, A. A., Busch, M., & Cumming, A. (2014). Do adult ESL learners’ and their teachers’ goals for improving grammar in writing correspond? Language Awareness, 23(3), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.758127
Zhou, J., Wang, S., &, Wang, J. (2022). Investigating high schoolers’ L2 writing anxiety, L2 writing self-efficacy, L2 writing self-regulated strategies, and L2 writing engagement: relationships and mediator. Frontiers, 13, 1012407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012407
Zsubrinszky, Z. (2009). A genre-based study of business emails – An analysis of British and Hungarian L1 and L2 business email. [Unpublished PhD dissertation.] Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



