Investigating an Adapted Process Genre Writing Model and Its Implications for Undergraduate Thai Students

Sarath Withanarachchi Samaranayake, Patteera Thienoermpool, Suneeta Kositchaivat

Abstract


Teaching academic writing to English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students poses significant challenges, often requiring instructors to adapt their instructional strategies to effectively meet learners' diverse needs and contexts. This study investigates the impact of an adapted process genre writing model, enhanced with teacher-prepared materials, on improving the academic writing proficiency of tertiary-level students at a public university in Thailand. A quantitative research method was employed for this study, involving a sample of 48 participants selected through convenience sampling. Over one semester, these students received intensive instruction based on the adapted process genre writing model. Data collection involved administering pre-and post-tests to measure changes in writing performance, with statistical analyses conducted using descriptive statistics and paired-sample t-tests to determine the significance of any improvements. The results revealed statistically significant improvements (p < .05) in participants' writing proficiency, demonstrating the effectiveness of the adapted process genre writing model. The results suggest that integrating customized instructional resources into this framework can significantly support the academic writing development of Thai EFL undergraduates. The study's implications for EFL instruction are substantial, suggesting that a well-structured, genre-based approach, supplemented with tailored instructional materials, can significantly elevate students' writing proficiency in academic contexts. Recommendations for further research include exploring the long-term effects of this instructional model on students' writing abilities and investigating its applicability across different language proficiency levels and cultural settings.

Keywords


Process genre model, teacher-designed materials, tertiary-level students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.1.5

Archibald, A., & Jeffery, G. C. (2000). Second Language Acquisition and Writing: Multi-Disciplinary approach. Learning and Instruction, 10, 1−11.

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54 (2), 153−160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153

Baker, K. M. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students' writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education. 17(3), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654794

Barua. S. (2017). A Study of Problems and Solutions for English Writing Skills of Students of MCU (Master’s thesis, Mahachulongkornrajaviyalaya University). http://lph.mcu.ac.th/site/thesiscontent_desc.php?ct=1&t_id=3575

Bin-Hady, W. R. A., Nasser, A. N. A. N., & Al-Kadi, A. T. (2020). A pre-experimental study on a Process-Genre Approach for Teaching Essay Writing. Journal of Language and Education, 6(4), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10347

Brick, J., Herke, M., & Wong, D. (2016). Academic Culture, A students guide to studying at university, 3rd edition. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cambridge University Press and Assessment. (2016). Cambridge English Proficiency 2: Authentic Examination Papers from Cambridge English Language Assessment.

Cheng, Z., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Engaging secondary school students with peer feedback in L2 writing classrooms: A mixed-methods study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337

Council of Europe. (2023). Common European Framework for Languages (CEFR): Common Reference levels. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european- Framework-reference-languages

Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. National Council of Teachers of English.

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching. 40(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144

Hairston, M. A. K. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in teaching writing. College Composition and Communication, 33(1), 76–88.

Halpern, J. W., Kroll, B. M., & Vann, R. J. (1982). Exploring Speaking-Writing Relationships: Connections and Contrasts. College Composition and Communication, 33(4), 464−466. https://doi.org/10.2307/357967

Hasnawati, H., Mujahidin, E., & Tanjung, H. (2023). Analyzing Students’ Difficulties in Writing English Essay. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research. 6(10), 5954−5959. http//doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-22.

Horkoff, T. (2021). Writing for success. 1st Canadian H5P Editon. BCcampus.

Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Does a Process-Genre Approach Help to Improve Students’ Argumentative Writing in English as a Foreign Language? Findings From an Intervention Study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 339−364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223

Huizhen, W., Huimin, Z., & Xiaohu, Y. (2022). The effects of providing peer feedback on learners’ genre awareness in English as a foreign language business letter writing. Frontiers in Psychology,13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059555

Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.

IELTS Writing Key Assessment Criteria. (2023). Retrieved from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/ielts-web-sta

Kirkpatrick, L., & Klein, P. (2009). Planning text structure as a way to improve students' writing from sources in the compare–contrast genre. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 309−321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.001.

Kitjaroonchai, N., Kit, T., & Sanitchai, P. (2022). The Effects of Process Genre-Based Writing and Process Writing Approaches on Asian EFL Pre-University Students’ Writing Performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(4), 860−871. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1304.19

Lun, S., Kanokkamalade, V., & Klinchan, N. (2021). A Study of English Writing Problems of Undergraduate Students of the Faculty of

Humanities at Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Nongkhai Campus, Thailand. Journal of MCU Humanities Review, 6(2), 267–275. https://so03.tcithaijo.org/index.php/human/article/view/240322

Luu, T. T. (2011). Teaching Writing through Genre-based Approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,2(1), 121–136. 10.4304/tpls.1.11.1471-1478.

Maolida, E. H., & Salsabila, V. A. (2019). Integrating Process-genre Approach with Project Ibunka to Improve Students’ English Writing. Journal of English Education, 8(1), 91−100. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2057

McDonough, K., Ammar, A., & Michaud, G. (2022). L2 peer interaction before and after writing: How does each one promote writing development? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 78(1), 1–16, https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2020-0073

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2010). Research synthesis. Language Teaching, 43(4), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444810000200

Nguyen, C. (2018). The construction of age-appropriate pedagogies for young learners of English in primary schools. The Language Learning Journal, 49(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1451912.

Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring Second Language Classroom Research. Heinle, Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1982431

Raza, K., & Brown, R. D. (2021). Language acquisition theory and context in materials development for second language writing courses. Journal of Asia TEFL,18(2), 649–656. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.19.649

Riazi, A. M. (2003). Methodology and Material Design in Language Teaching: Current Perceptions and Practices and their Implications. Anthology, 44(6), 52–69.

Thuong, T. T., & Phusawisot, P. (2020). The Integration of Process Writing and Genre-Based Approach to Enhancing Thai Students' Narrative Writing Ability at the University Level [Doctoral dissertation, Mahasarakham University]. University Repository. http://202.28.34.124/dspace/handle123456789/1268

Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yan, G. (2005). A Process Genre Model for Teaching Writing. English

Teaching Forum, 43(3), 18−26. https://americanenglish.state.gov/resources/english-teaching-forum- 2005-volume-43-number-3

Wardani, W. O. S., Guawan, W., Emilia, E., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). The Implementation of Genre-Based Pedagogy with Technology in EFL Classroom. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research,595, 708−714. https://doi.org/ 10.2991/assehr.k.211119.109.

Wihastyanang, W. D., Kusumaningrum, S., & Latief, M., & C. B. (2020). Impacts of Providing Online Teacher and Peer Feedback on Students’ Writing Performance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21, 178−189. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.728157.

Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning. TESOLQuarterly, 16(2), 195−209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586792.

Zamel, V. (1983). The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165−187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586647.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1852

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Abstracting and Indexing

              

 



Contact Us: IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics;

Address: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: ijeltalj@gmail.com