The Influence of Hypnoteaching Method on Students’ Reading Motivation and Achievement in Secondary School

Lismalinda Lismalinda, Moriyanti Moriyanti

Abstract


This pre-experimental research was aimed to examine the influence of hypnoteaching method toward students’ reading motivation and achievement. The sample was 40 students with purposive sampling technique. Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ) and test were the research instruments to gain the data quantitatively. Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ) adopted from Wigfield and Guthrie (1997) to examine students’ reading motivation levels. For reading achievement, pre-test and post-test were distributed to assess the students’ reading outcome about Narrative Text before and after applying hypnoteaching method. The results of this research showed that the implementation of hypnoteaching method affected students reading motivation and learning outcome. The mean score of pre motivation for reading Questionnaire (MRQ) was 40.2 indicated poor reader and it raised to be 81.1 showing good reader after the implementation of hypnoteaching method. Furthermore, hypnoteaching method also affects English reading result which the mean of pre-test was 45.30 indicating poor score criterion of English subject, meanwhile, after being taught applying hypnoteaching method, the score inclined to 90.25 which asserted good score criterion of English subject. The value of t test was 14.88 from data of pre-test and post-test, however the value of t table was 1.99. It represented that the alternative hypothesis (H1) was accepted and revealed that hypnoteaching method can influence students’ reading achievement. Finally, it was suggested that English teacher should implement this method in teaching English for secondary school students and can be conducted for further research.


Keywords


hypnoteaching, influence, reading achievemen,t reading motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aksan, N., & Kisac, B. (2009). A descriptive study: Reading comprehension and cognitive awareness skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 834-837.

Ary, Donald et al. (2010). Introduction to Reseacrh in Education (Eighth Edition). United States of Amerika: Wadsworth.

Budiman. (2016). Efektivitas Hypnoterapi Teknik Anchor Terhadap Perubahan Perilaku Merokok Remaja [The Effectiveness of Anchor Technique Hypnotherapy towards Changes In Youth Smoking Behavior]. PSIKIS: Jurnal Psikologi Islami, Vol 2. No 2, 2016. 135-148.

Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Seven Rules of Engagement: What’s Most Important to Know about Motivation to Read. The Reading Teacher, Vol 65. No 3, 2011. 172–178. doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01024.

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and Motivation in Reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr, Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 403-422). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Hajar, I. (2011). Hypnoteaching Memaksimalkan Hasil Proses Belajar-Mengajar dengan Hypnoterapi [Hypnoteaching Maximizes the Results of Teaching and Learning Using Hypnotherapy]. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Hakim, A. (2010). Hypnosis in Teaching, Cara Dahsyat Mendidik dan Mengajar [Hypnosis in Teaching, the Powerful Way to Educate and Teach]. Jakarta: Visiamedia.

Hartas, D. (2010). Educational Research and Inquiry. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Hasbullah & Rahmawati. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Hypnoteaching Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Universitas Indraprasta PGRI [The Influence Hypnoteaching Methods on Student Motivation in Indraprasta PGRI University]. FORMATIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, Vol 5. No. 1, 2015. 83-90.

Jaya, N. T. (2010). Hypno-Teaching (Bukan Sekedar Mengajar) [Hypnoteaching (Extraordinary Teaching)]. Yogyakarta: D-Brain.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Kasmaja, H. (2017). The Effectiveness of the Implementation of Hypnoteaching Method to Improve Motivation and Mathematics Learning Result of Class VII Students at Smpn 41 Bulukumba. Jurnal Daya Matematis, Vol 5. No. 1, 2017. 103-119.

Mori, S. (2002). Redefining Motivation to Read in a Foreign Language. Reading in a Foreign Language, Vol 14. No. 2, 2002. 91–110.

Noer, M. (2010). Hypnoteaching for Success Learning. Yogyakarta: Pedagogia.

Nugraha & Sugianto (2017). Hipnoterapi pada Pasien Nyeri Kronik. [Hypnotherapi in Chronic Pain patients]. Berkala Ilmiah Kedokteran Duta Wacana, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2017. 317-324.

Pathak, R. P. (2008). Methodology of Educational Research. New Delhi: Atlantic Publisher & Distributors.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian [Research Methodology]. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wigfield, A. & Guthrie J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 89, 420-432.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.286

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Creative Commons License
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 

Abstracting and Indexing

                  



Contact Us: IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics; Address: FTIK, IAIN Samarinda; Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: ijeltalj@gmail.com