Online Communicative Speaking Tasks to Enhance Students’ Speaking Skills

Shafira Adhelia, Anita Triastuti

Abstract


This study aimed to know whether the use of online communicative speaking tasks can enhance the speaking skills of the ninth graders of a private junior high school in Mungkid, the Province of Central Java, and how well their speaking skills improved. This research was action research that was divided into four stages. Those were reconnaissance, plan, action and observation, and reflection. The research involved 24 students in 9A class of a private junior high school in the academic year of 2022/ 2023. The research was done in two cycles, consisting of eight meetings. The data of the research were collected through quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data were from speaking tests and questionnaires. Meanwhile, the qualitative data were obtained from interviews and observation. The quantitative data were analyzed by comparing students' mean scores that were gained from students' speaking performance pre-test and post-test. The qualitative data analysis employed Miles, Huberman & Saldana's (2014) interactive model that consists of data condensation, data display, and drawing and verifying conclusions. The research findings showed that using online communicative speaking tasks effectively enhanced students’ speaking skills and engagement. The result of the post-test showed that there were consistent improvements in students' mean scores in pre-cycle (10.48), cycle I (13.69), and cycle II (18.50). The total improvement from pre-cycle to cycle II was 8.02 points. It indicated that the students had improved in some aspects of speaking skills.

Keywords


Online speaking tasks, action research, speaking skill

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Alastal, M., Aladini, A., Jalambo, M., & Alattal, H. (2022). The impact of using the padlet application on improving 7th graders' English speaking and deductive thinking skills. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i2.4233

Alzamil, A. (2021). Teaching English speaking online versus face-to-face: Saudi students’ experience during the covid-19 pandemic. Arab World English Journal, 12 (1), 19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3826486

Amirulloh, D.N.K.S., Damayanti, I. L., & Citraningrum, E. (2021). Flipgrid: A pathway to enhance students’ speaking performance. Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.014

Anderson, N., & Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill.

Arega, E. E. (2017). Impediments of students' English language speaking skill in two selected preparatory schools in Wolaita zone. European Scientific Journal, 13(14), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n14p83

Arslanyilmaz, A. (2012). An online task-based language learning environment: Is it better for advanced-or intermediate-level second language learners?. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(1), 20–35.

Baker, J., & Westrup, H. (2003). Essential speaking skills. A&C Black.

Baralt, M., & Morcillo Gomez, J. (2017). Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 28–43.

Barcroft, J. (2015). Vocabulary in language teaching. Routledge.

Brown, H D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson Education.

Brown, H Douglas. (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (Vol. 10). Pearson Education White Plains.

Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, evaluating, quantitative and qualitative research (fourth edition). Pearson Education Inc.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Garcia-Sanchez, S. (2016). Online metacognitive tasks for EFL distance learners. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.60563

Geçkin, V. (2022). What’s covid19 got to do with my communicative competence? Self-reflections of pre-service English language teachers in Turkey. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i2.1050

Gloriez, P. (2022). Communicative language teaching and its implementation in online learning: The teachers’ voice. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(1), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.751

González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014). Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (Vol. 6). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Govindasamy, M., & Shah, P. M. (2020). Students’ perceptions on collaborative speaking tasks in ESL classrooms. Creative Education, 11(11), 2280–2292. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1111167

Harmer, J. (2001). How to teach English-seventh impression. Longman.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Longman.

Iftanti, E. (2022). The EFL learners’ lens on online teaching speaking and its effective teachers at islamic higher education. Dinamika Ilmu, 451–469. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v22i2.5347

Iino, A., Yabuta, Y., & Nakamura, Y. (2016). Effects of task-based videoconferencing on speaking performance and overall proficiency. CALL Communities and Culture–Short Papers from EUROCALL, 196–200.

Ipek, O.F. & Ustunbas, Z. (2021). Applications used in distance education in English

language education. Journal of English teaching, 7(3), 260-272. https://doi.org/

33541/jet.v7i3.3027

Kaniadewi, N. (2022). Students’ perceptions in the utilization of zoom video conferencing on speaking ability in distance learning. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.891

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.

Loranc-Paszylk, B. (2015). Videoconferencing as a tool for developing speaking skills. In Issues in Teaching, Learning and Testing Speaking in A Second Language (pp. 189–203). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38339-7_12

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge University Press.

Maulana, R., Daud, B., & Heriansyah, H. (2016). Students’ views on EFL speaking problems. Proceedings of EEIC, 1(1), 34-42.

Maulidah, I. (2017). Vlog: The mean to improve students' speaking ability. In International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2017) (pp. 12-15). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconelt-17.2018.3

Miles, H., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3. Sage Publications.

Mohammadi, M., & Safdari, N. (2015). Pedagogical values of mobile-assisted task-based activities to enhance speaking skill. 2015 EUROCALL Conference, 416–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000368

Ng, C. H. (2020). Communicative language teaching (CLT) through synchronous online teaching in English language preservice teacher education. International Journal of TESOL Studies (Special Issue “ELT in the Time of the Coronavirus 2020”, Part 1), 2(2), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.06

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D., & Carter, R. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching english to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.

Nugroho, A. J., Rohman, A., & Geroda, G. B. (2021). Analysis of student self-regulation in learning English speaking skill. EDUCASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21462/educasia.v5i1.47

Portilla A, L., & Camacho V, G. (2017). A webquest tool to develop communicative competence in EFL students with an A2 proficiency level. Zona Próxima, 26, 82–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.14482/zp.26.10201

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre Singapore.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Routledge.

Sari, Y. N., & Margana, M. (2019). YouTube as a learning media to improve the student’s speaking ability in 21st century. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 4(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v4i2.296

Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.

Subiana, I. P., Sukyadi, D., & Purnawarman, P. (2022). Using flipgrid as electronic portfolio in speaking assessment. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 18(2), 187-202.

Suvarnaphaet, K. M., & Suvarnaphaet, P. (2023). Use of podcasts to develop students’ speaking skills. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 23 (1), 1-8.

Tuyet, T. T. B., & Khang, N. D. (2020). The influences of the flipgrid app on Vietnamese EFL high school learners’ speaking anxiety. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i1.3264

Vurdien, R. (2019). Videoconferencing: Developing students’ communicative competence. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 4(2), 269–298.

Waluyo, B. (2019). Task-based language teaching and theme-based role-play: developing efl learners’ communicative competence. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 16(1), 153–168.

Willis, J., & Willis, D. (2007). Doing task-based teaching-Oxford handbooks for language teachers. Oxford University Press.

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning (Vol. 60). Longman Harlow.

Yulia, Y. (2013). Teaching challenges in Indonesia: Motivating students and teachers’ classroom language. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1–16.

Ziegler, N. (2016). Taking technology to task: Technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000039




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i2.1365

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Creative Commons License
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 

Abstracting and Indexing

                       

 




Contact Us: IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics;

Address: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: ijeltalj@gmail.com