The Students’ Responses on Learning English Phonology Deploying Scaffolding: How does This Technique Support Higher Linguistics Stages?

Dwi Astuti Wahyu Nurhayati

doi:10.21093/ijeltal.v7i1.1271

The Students’ Responses on Learning English Phonology Deploying Scaffolding: How does This Technique Support Higher Linguistics Stages?

Dwi Astuti Wahyu Nurhayati

Abstract

The indicated research aimed to identify pupils’ reactions to the deploying scaffolding technique to learn English phonology. In this research, the data were assembled for 5 months, starting from February to June 2022, and they were gained through observation and distributing questionnaires by individual and group assessment. It involved 48 Indonesian college students in the second semester who were majoring in English and joining English phonology classes as well. The students and lecturers conducted demonstrative school room reciprocal action in English interaction phases in UIN SATU Tulungagung, East Java, Indonesia. The inputs could be figured out by adopting a qualitative way. From the results, it can be discovered that the implementation of scaffolding techniques in understanding English phonology influenced students deeply. The result showed that some students’ perspectives included: the students ‘handling difficulties in conducting teamwork for scaffolding technique, students’ ability in understanding English phonology, and student’s attitudes towards the implementation of scaffolding during the learning process.

Keywords

Learning English Phonology, Students’ Responses, Scaffolding Technique

Full Text:

Download PDF

References

Anita, A. (2019). Teacher’s Instructional Scaffolding in Teaching for Speaking to Kampung Inggris Rafflessia Rejang Lebong Participantas. Al-Lughah: Jurnal Bahasa, 8(2), 18-29. https:doi.org/10.29300/lughah.v8i2.2360

Ary, D., Chester, L. J., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

Aukerman, M.S. (2007). When Reading It Wrong is Getting it Right: Shared Evaluation Pedagogy among Struggling Fifth Grade Readers. Research in Teaching of English, 42, 56-103.

Bruner, J. S., David, W., & Gail Ross. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17, (2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Chi,M.T.H., Siler,S.A., Jeong,H., Yamauchi, T., &Hausmann, R.G. (2001). Learning from Human Tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.

Chiu, M.H., Chou,C.C., &Liu, C.J. (2002). Dynamic Processes of Conceptual Change: Analysis of Constructing Mental Models of Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 688-712.

Davis,E.A., & Miyake,N. (2004).Exploration of Scaffolding in Complex Classroom System. Journal of Learning Sciences. 13. 265-272.

De Pol, V. J., Volman, M. & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educ.Psychol., 22, 271-296.

Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2002). Children’s genre knowledge: An examination of K-5 students’ performance on multiple tasks providing differing levels of scaffolding. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 428-465.

Ferguson, N. (2006). Advantages and Disadvantages of working in Groups. Cited in Steffen, A. 2006. Worldchanging: A User’s Guide for the 21st Century. New York: Harry N. Abrams.

Ghorbani, M. (2016) Effect of Scaffolding in a Cooperative Learning Condition on Undergraduate EFL Learner’s Vocbulary Retention. Foreign Language Teaching, 4 (6),12-16.

Granott, N. (2005). Scaffolding Dynamically toward Change: Previous and New Perspectives. New Ideas in Psychology, 23,140-151.

Grigorenko,E.L. (2009). Dynamic Assessment and Responses to Intervention: Two Sides of One Coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42,140-151.

Grigg, G., & McGreggor, D. (2011). Scaffolding and mediating for creativity: suggestions from reflecting on practice in order to develop the teaching and learning of gymnastics. Journal of Further and Education,36. Issue 2.

Gusri, A.E.(2015). English Phonological Problems Encountered by Buginese Learners. Journal on English Language Teaching & Learning Linguistics and Literature, 3 (1), 1-8.

Hamidi, E., & Bagherzadeh, R. (2018). The Logical of Scaffolding in Second Language Acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second Language and Foreign Education, 3 (19), 1-14.

Hammond, J. (2001). Scaffolding Teaching and Learning in Language and Literacy Education. Newtown NSW 2042 Australia.

Harraqi, M. 92017). Review of Aida Walqui’s Scaffolding instruction for English Language Learners: A Conceptual Framework. American Journal of Arts and Design, 2 (3), 84-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajad,20170203.13

Hinkel, E. (2005). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. London: Seattle University.

Kamil, R. (2017). Exploring Teacher’s Scaffolding to the Students in Teaching Writing, Journal of English and Education, 5 (2), 187-193.

Kivi, J.P., Namziandost, E., Saenko, R.N., & Alamdari, F.E. (2021). Comparative Effects of Teacher versus Peer-Scaffolding on EFL Learners’ Mental Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50 (3), 1031-1047. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4

Kulju,P .& Makinen, M. (2019). Phonological Strategies and Peer Scaffolding in Digital Literacy Game-Playing Sessions in a Finish Pre-Primary Class. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 21 (3),338-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798419838576

Kulsoom, S.,Hussain,I., Raza,S., & Ghani,S. (2021). Effectiveness of Scaffolding Instrcutions for Speaking Skill of Secondary School Students in Punjab. Illkogretim Online,20(2),1000-1008.htpps://doi.org/10.1705I/ilkonline.2021.02.112

Lin, T-C, Hsu,Y-S,H.,Lin, Shu-S., Changlai,M-Li, C.,Yang, K-Y., &Lai, T-L. (2012). A Review of Empirical Evidence on Scaffolding for Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10 (20, 437-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9322-z

Mahan, K., Lisbeth, M., & Marrian, O. (2021). Characterizing CLIL teacher: New Insights from a lower secondary Classroom. International of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24 (3), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1472206

Mahan, K. R. (2020): The comprehending teacher: scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL), The Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879

Maloch, B. (2002). Scaffolding Student Talk: One Teacher’s Role in Literature Discussion Group. Reading Research Quarterly, 37,92-112

Maloch, B. (2008). Beyond Exposure: The Uses of Information Texts in a Second Grade Classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 315-12.

Myhill,D., &Warren, P. (2015). Scaffolds or Straitjackets? Critical Moment in Classroom Discourse. Educational Psychology, 20, 17-25.

Maybin,J., Neil,M., & Stierer,B. (1992). Scaffolding: Learning in the Classroom.in Thinking Voices. The Work of the National Oracy Project, ed. Kate Norman, 186-195.London: Hodder &Stoughton.

McMahon, A. (2002). An Introduction to English Phonology. Edinburgh University Press Ltd 22 George Square, Edinburgh.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Johnny Saldana. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook (3rd ed.). Arizona State University: Sage Publications.

Mulatsih, S. (2011). The Use of Scaffolding Technique to Improve the Students’ Competence in Genre-Based Texts. Perole, 2 (1),101-109. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v2i1%20April.101-109

Munawar, M. (2019). Using Scaffolding Technique to Improve Students’ Speaking Skill at Eleventh Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Labuapi in Academic Year 2019/2020 [Unpublished Thesis] Universiats Islam Negeri Mataram. https://etheses.uinmataram.ac.id/962/

Murphy, N., & Messer, D. (2000). Differential Benefits from Scaffolding and Children Working Alone. Educational Psychology, 57, 55-69.

Nassaji, H. & Cumming, A. (2000). What’s in a ZPD? A Case Study of a Young ESL Student and Teacher Interacting through Dialogue Journals. Language Teaching Research, 4, 95-121.

Nathan,M., & Kim,s. (2009). Regulation of Teacher Elicitations in Mathematics Classroom. Cognition & Instruction, 27, 91-120.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2018). English Phonetics: Theory and Practices. Tulungagung. Akademia Pustaka.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2019). Introduction to English Phonology. Tulungagung. Akademia Pustaka.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2019). Students ‘Perspective on Innovative Teaching Model Using Edmodo in Teaching English Phonology: A Virtual Class Development. Dinamika Ilmu,(1),13-35.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2020). Phonology and Online Media Used in Enhancing Listening Skill. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics (IJEFL), 5 (2), 267-278.

Nurhayati, D.A, W. (2021). Phonology in Teaching English. Tulungagung. Akademia Pustaka.

Oh, P.S. (2005). Discursive Roles of the Teacher during Class Sessions for Students Presenting Their Science Investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1825-1851.

Pratt,N.W., & Savoy-Lavene, K.M. (1998). Contingent Tutoring of Long-Division Skills in Fourth and Fifth Graders: Experimental Test of Some Hypothesis about Scaffolding. Journal, of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 287-304.

Rahmah, F., & Nurjanah, St. YT. (2016). The Use of Scaffolding Talk Technique to Improve the Second Grade Students Speaking Skill at MTS Madani Paopao Gowa. ETERNAL, 2 (2),252-268.

Reigosa, C., & Jimnez-Aleixandre,M.P. (2007). Scaffolding Problem-Solving in the Physics and Chemistry Laboratory: Difficulties Hindering Students Assumption of Responsibilty. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 307-329.

Renaldi, A., Stefani, R.R., & Gulo, I. (2016, 96-100). Phonological Difficulties Faced by Students in Learning English.[Paper Presentation] Proceedings ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 4(1).

Renninger, K.A., &Granott, N. (2005). The Process of Scaffolding in Learning and Development. New Ideas in Psychology, 23, 111-114.

Renninger, K.A., Ray.L.S., Luft,L., & Newton.E.L. (2005). Coding Online Content-Informed Scaffolding of Mathematical Thinking. New Ideas in Psychology, 23,152-165.

Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

Rodgers, .M. (2004). Interactions that Scaffold Reading Performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 501-532.

Ruiz De Zarobe,Y., & Zenotz, V. (2018). Learning Strategies in CLIL Classrooms: How Does Strategy Instruction Affect Reading Competence over Time? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21, (3), 319-331 .https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1391745

Sari,A.R.F., & Munir,A. (2018). The Use of Scaffolding on Teaching Process on Students’Writing in a Senior High School. Retain, 6 (2), 166-174.

Sari,D.K., & Rozimela,Y. (2021,51-56). The Implementation of Scaffolding Strategies at Speaking English Course in Kampung Pare East Java. [Paper Presentation] Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts (ICLA 2020), 539,51-56. https;//doi.org/10.299/asschr.k.210325.010

Schreiber, M. L., & Valle, E.B. (2013) Social Constructivist Teaching Strategies in the Small Group. Small Group Research, 44 (4),396-411 .https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413488422

Slavin, R.E. (2010). Co-operative Learning: What makes Groupwork Work? In H. Dumont, D.Instance, & F. Benavides (Eds.),The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice. (pp.161-178). Paris, France: OECD.

Sugiharti, A. (2018). Implementation of Scaffolding Strategy to Teach Reading in MTsN Paron. [Unpublished Thesis]. Department of Language Studies, Graduate School of Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 1-23.

Van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Leaning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Boston: Kuhler. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5

Vickie, A., & Clinton, E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: an acceptable design. Journal of Nursing Research, 16 (4), 255-256.

Vonna, Y., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The Effect of Scaffolding Techniques on Students’ Writing Achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora. 3(1),227-233.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). Thinking and Speech. The Collected works of LS Vygotsky, 1, 39-285.

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding Instruction for English Language Learners: A Conceptual Framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9 (2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639

Yeh, Y., Huang, L-Y., Yeh, Y-L. (2011). Knowledge Management in Blended Learning: Impacts on Professional Development in Creativity Instruction. Computers & Education, 56 (1), 146-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.011

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i1.1271

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.