Reading Preferences across Genders of Undergraduate EFL Students in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i1.918Keywords:
extensive reading, leisure time, reading preferencesAbstract
Due to pandemics, students carry out their studies from home. They have more leisure time and are freer to do activities. In such a condition, questioning students’ commitment to reading to learn becomes relevant. The question is whether and to what extent the students do the reading activity, what they read, and whether their preferences are different based on their genders. This topic is inconclusively studied, especially in the context of EFL. Therefore, it seems important to conduct a study on this topic because the results might raise the effectiveness of teaching EFL. This study is a descriptive survey revealing students’ reading preferences to spend their leisure time based on gender differences. The subjects are undergraduate EFL students aged 19–23 years who study at the English Department in Indonesia. The data were collected by a questionnaire consisting of closed and open items. The responses were tallied, calculated, and tabulated. The findings show that female respondents favored reading more than males. Both genders tend to prefer reading social media to spend their leisure time. Female respondents are more likely to read e-books, while male respondents are more into the printed books. They do extensive reading to get knowledge more than to get pleasure. Although they are EFL learners, they prefer reading the sources in their native language because it is more accessible than in the target language. The reasons underlying those findings and pedagogical implications are also described at the end of the article.References
Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2018). Students’ academic reading preferences: An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616656044
Akbari, H., Ghonsooly, B., Ghazanfari, M., & Shahriari, H. (2017). Attitude toward reading: L1 or L2 or both. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017717303
Alakawi, K. M. (2017). Vocabulary Strategies and Bridging the Gap from Learning to Read to Reading to Learn. Journal of Language and Education, 3(4), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-4-60-72
Chen, C.-N., Chen, S.-C., Chen, S.-H. E., & Wey, S.-C. (2013). The effects of extensive reading viae-books on tertiary level EFL students’ reading attitude, reading comprehension and vocabulary. Nation, 12, 303–312.
Chow, B. W. Y., Chiu, H. T., & Wong, S. W. L. (2017). Anxiety in reading and listening English as a foreign language in Chinese undergraduate students. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817702159
Delfi, S., & Yamat, H. (2017). Extensive reading in developing English competency for Indonesian EFL learners majoring in English. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 153–164. www.ijeltal.org
Ghanbari, M., & Marzban, A. (2014). Effect of Extensive Reading on Incidental Vocabulary Retention. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 3854–3858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.854
Huang, H.-C. (2013). E-reading and e-discussion: EFL learners’ perceptions of an e-book reading program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.656313
Indrayadi, T. (2021). Indonesian EFL learners’ reading motivation. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i2.745
Iwahori, Y., High, N., & Japan, S. (2008). Developing reading fluency: A study of extensive reading in EFL. Reading in A Foreign Language, 20(1), 70–91. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl
Karim, N. S. A., & Hasan, A. (2007). Reading habits and attitude in the digital age: Analysis of gender and academic program differences in Malaysia. Electronic Library, 25(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710754805
Krashen, S. D. (1994). The power of reading: Insights from the research. In The Modern Language Journal (2nd ed., Vol. 78, Issue 3). Libraries Unlimited. https://doi.org/10.2307/330145
Kurata, K., Ishita, E., Miyata, Y., & Minami, Y. (2017). Print or digital? Reading behavior and preferences in Japan. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 884–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23712
Lee, J., Schallert, D. L., & Kim, E. (2015). Effects of extensive reading and translation activities on grammar knowledge and attitudes for EFL adolescents. System, 52(2015), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.016
Lin, C. C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers and Education, 78(2014), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.004
Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x
Loh, C. E., Sun, B., & Majid, S. (2019). Do girls read differently from boys? Adolescents and their gendered reading habits and preferences. English in Education, 54(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1610328
Long, D., & Szabo, S. (2016). E-readers and the effects on students’ reading motivation, attitude and comprehension during guided reading. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1197818
McLean, S., & Rouault, G. (2017). The effectiveness and efficiency of extensive reading at developing reading rates. System, 70(2017), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.003
Mikulec, A., & Vuić, B. (2019). The Relationship between L1 and L2 Reading Comprehension and Language and Reading Proficiency at the Tertiary Level. Journal of Language and Education, 5(4), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.17323/JLE.2019.9773
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A. M., Kurbanoglu, S., & Boustany, J. (2018). Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide: A comparative survey analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(5), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444
Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2005). Non-response in student surveys: The role of demographics, engagement and personality. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2
Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2002). Extensive Reading: Why Aren’t We All Doing It? In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice (pp. 295–302). Cambridge University Press.
Salikin, H., Zulfiqar Bin-Tahir, S., Kusumaningputri, R., & Yuliandari, D. P. (2017). The Indonesian EFL learners’ motivation in reading. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n5p81
Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., Wigfield, A., Nolen, S., & Baker, L. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030
Scott, S. (2019). Gender Differences Within the Workplace. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/gender-differences-within-workplace-10512.html
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
Stokmans, M. J. W. (1999). Reading attitude and its effect on leisure time reading. POETICS, 26(4), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00005-4
Suk, N. (2016). The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 0(0), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.152
Swalander, L., & Taube, K. (2007). Influences of family based prerequisites, reading attitude, and self-regulation on reading ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(2007), 206–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.01.002
Zhang, Y., & Kudva, S. (2014). E-books versus print books: Readers’ choices and preferences across contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1695–1706. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23076
