Exploring the Influence of Computer-Based National Examination on English Teaching Process: Voices from Indonesian EFL Teachers

Moch. Said Mardjuki, Arif Husein Lubis

Abstract


Currently, the government of Indonesia has implemented a computer-based test for the national examination for secondary schools in Indonesia. It is believed that the administration of computer-based national examination (CBNE) would address some challenges related to dishonesty and validity. The present study is aimed to investigate the teachers’ perception of the implementation of CBNE and its influence on the English teachers’ teaching process. This study employed a qualitative design in which semi-structured interviews and document analysis from the English teachers’ lesson plans were done to obtain comprehensive data. The analysis results revealed that the teachers held a positive view of the implementation of CBNE because it is effective and efficient in terms of the process, security, scoring, and cost-saving. Besides, the components of the teaching process influenced by the administration of CBNE were extra class, teaching materials, teaching methods, and teaching activities. However, the implementation of CBNE still led to several challenges in terms of technical problems and a lack of computer experts. Therefore, by conducting an internship with other supporting parties, those challenges would be minimized.

Keywords


CBNE, challenges, English teaching process, perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agirdag, O., & Vanlaar, G. (2018). Does more exposure to the language of instruction lead to higher academic achievement? A cross-national examination. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(1), 123–137.

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Technology in testing: The present and the future. System, 28(4), 593–603.

Aziez, F. (2011). Examining the vocabulary levels of Indonesia’s English national examination texts. Asian EFL Journal, 51, 16–29.

Boevé, A. J., Meijer, R. R., Albers, C. J., Beetsma, Y., & Bosker, R. J. (2015). Introducing computer-based testing in high-stakes exams in higher education: Results of a field experiment. PLoS ONE, 10(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143616

Brown, J. D. (1997). Computers in language testing: Present research and some future directions. Language Learning and Technology, 1(1), 44–59.

Cantillon, P., Irish, B., & Sales, D. (2004). Using computers for assessment in medicine. BMJ, 329(7466), 606–609.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2019). UNBK 2020.

Daeli, N. H., Hutapea, Y. J. N., Gea, F. D. N., Lestari, I., & Saragih, E. (2020). Identifying reading comprehension questions of national examination for senior high school students. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(1), 83–90.

Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. Malaysia: Pearson Education.

Dunkel, P. (1999). Considerations in developing or using second/foreign language proficiency computer-adaptive tests. Language Learning and Technology, 2(2), 77–93.

Cambridge English. (2017). CEFR diagram.

Exam English. (2014). PTE. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from https://www.examenglish.com/PTE/index.php

Ferman, I. (2004). The washback of an EFL national oral matriculation. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 191–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Furaidah, Saukah, A., & Widiati, U. (2015). Washback of English national examination in the Indonesian context. TEFLIN Journal, 26(1), 36–58.

Hapli, A., Kristiyono, E., & Alamsyah, Z. (2017). Permasalahan digital divide pada pelaksanaan ujian nasional berbasis komputer UNBK di Indonesia. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from https://mti.binus.ac.id/2017/07/03/permasalahan-digital-divide-pada-pelaksanaan-ujian-nasional-berbasis-komputer-unbk-di-indonesia/

Harmiyuni, & Sailan, M. (2016). Persepsi siswa tentang pelaksanaan ujian nasional berbasis computer di SMK Komputer Mutiara Ilmu Makassar. Jurnal Tomalebbi, 2, 36–42.

Ibrahim, M. S. (2014). Maximizing reading strategies: Helping students in facing national examination of English subject. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(13), 124–132.

Ilc, G., & Stopar, A. (2015). Validating the Slovenian national alignment to CEFR: The case of the B2 reading comprehension examination in English. Language Testing, 32(4), 443–462.

Juknevičienė, R., & Šeškauskienė, I. (2014). The national examination of English in Lithuania: Searching for evidence of CEFR criterial achievement levels. Studies About Language, 25, 88–96.

Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Mutereko, S. (2018). Marketisation, managerialism, and high-stake testing: A tale teachers’ views on national assessments in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 568–579.

National Education Standard Office. (2017). Standard Operational Procedures of National Examination in academic year 2016/2017. Jakarta: National Education Standard Office.

National Education Standard Office. (2019). Standard Operational Procedures of National Examination in academic year 2019/2020. Jakarta: National Education Standard Office.

Pakpahan, R. (2016). Model ujian nasional berbasis komputer: manfaat dan tantangan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1(1), 19–35.

Pan, Y. (2009). A review of washback and its pedagogical implications. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 25, 257–263.

Parshall, C. G., Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., & Davey, T. (2002). Practical considerations in computer-based testing. New York, NY: Springer.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods whatever happened to qualitative description? A Journal in Research of Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340.

Secretariat, M. of the S. Indonesian President Regulation. , (2015).

Educational Testing Service. (1998). Computer-based TOEFL score user guide. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Spratt, M. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 5–29.

Sukyadi, D., & Mardiani, R. (2011). The washback effect of the English National Examination (ENE) on English teachers’ classroom teaching and students’ learning. K@ta, 13(1), 96–111.

Suvorov, R., & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Computer-assisted language testing. The Companion to Language Assessment, 2, 594–613.

Tayeb, Y. A., Aziz, M. S. A., Ismail, K., & Khan, A. B. M. A. (2014). The washback effect of the General Secondary English Examination (GSEE) on teaching and learning. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(3), 83–103.

UNESCO. (2011). Unesco ICT competency framework for teachers (2nd ed.). France: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i2.440

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Creative Commons License
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 

Abstracting and Indexing

                  



Contact Us: IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics; Address: FTIK, IAIN Samarinda; Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: ijeltalj@gmail.com