Readability of Reading Texts as Authentic Materials Issued by ChatGPT: A Systemic Functional Perspective
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
Download PDFReferences
Anthony, L. (2007). AntConc (3.2.1w) [Computer Software. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/
Arikan, A. (2015). The CEFR and Reading: A Document Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.538
Bailin, A., & Grafstein, A. (2015). Readability: Text and Context. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388773
Bani Amer, M., & Baarah, H. (2021). Readability and Lexical Density of Reading Sections of Tenth Grade English Textbooks in Jordan and Sultanate of Oman: A Comparative Study. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4, 1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i3.2438
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Worthy, J. (1995). Giving a Text Voice Can Improve Students’ Understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/748033
Cekiso, M. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of reading instruction in selected primary schools in the Eastern Cape. Reading & Writing, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v8i1.158
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=4PywcQAACAAJ
Dijk, T. A. van, & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press.
Dubay, W. (2004). The Principles of Readability. CA, 92627949, 631–3309.
Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics: 2nd Edition. A&C Black.
Europe, C. of. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, assessment: Companion volume. Council of Europe.
Fadhil, A., Gunawan, W., & Wirza, Y. (2023). Lexical Density in EFL Indonesian Textbooks: A Comparative Analysis. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v7i1.9727
Fitriana, P., Hadijah, D., & Lestari, Z. (2019). The Use of Authentic Material to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension. ELTIN JOURNAL, Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 7, 8. https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v7i1.p8-11
Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative Research in Education: Interaction and Practice. SAGE Publications.
Gashti, Y. B. (2018, October 1). The Effect of Authentic and Simplified Literary Texts on the Reading Comprehension of Iranian Advanced EFL Learners. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effect-of-Authentic-and-Simplified-Literary-on-Gashti/ad1e9b25ae234a94aa0f71e88381ea1268bfd25f
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grmmar. Gerd Stabler.
Gregori-Signes, C., & Clavel-Arroitia, B. (2015). Analysing Lexical Density and Lexical Diversity in University Students’ Written Discourse. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.477
Grimaldi, G., & Ehrler, B. (2023). AI et al.: Machines Are About to Change Scientific Publishing Forever. ACS Energy Letters, 8, 878–880. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02828
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed). Arnold ; Distributed in the United States of America by Oxford University Press.
Ismail, N. M., Yoestara, M., & Jamilah, S. (2023). Comparing lexical density in teacher talks: elementary school and higher education level. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.4971
Khaleel, R. (2021). The Effect of Using Semantic Map Technique in Teaching Reading Comprehension on Students’ Achievement. Al-Adab Journal, 2, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i137.1186
Kim, H.-S. (2015). Using Authentic Videos to Improve EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension. International Journal of Contents, 11, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2015.11.4.015
Lund, B. (2023). A Brief Review of ChatGPT: Its Value and the Underlying GPT Technology. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28474.06087
Maley, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2017). Authenticity in Materials Development for Language Learning. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Mara, R. R., & Mohamad, M. (2021). The Use of Authentic Materials in Teaching Reading to Secondary School Students in Malaysia: A Literature Review. Creative Education, 12(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.127129
Martin, R. A. (2007). Approaches to the Sense of Humor: A Historical Review. 47.
McCannon, B. C. (2019). Readability and Research Impact. Economics Letters, 180, 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.02.017
Mohammed, F. G. (2021). The Effects of Teaching Through Authentic Material on Efl Learners. Docens Series in Education, 1, 73–86.
Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Ahmad Tilwani, S., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2022). The Impact of Authentic Materials on Reading Comprehension, Motivation, and Anxiety Among Iranian Male EFL Learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1892001
Natova, I. (2021). Estimating CEFR reading comprehension text complexity. The Language Learning Journal, 49(6), 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1665088
Noviyenti, L. (2021). Analysis of English Alive Textbook in Terms of Genres and Lexical Density. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.587
Poonpon, K. (2010). Text Complexity and Reading Comprehension Tests. Erik Castello. Bern: Peter Lang,2008. Pp. 352. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(3), 512–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000197
Putra, D., & Lukmana, I. (2017). Text Complexity in Senior High School English Textbooks: A Systemic Functional Perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 198. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8352
Rahman, M., Terano, H. J., Rahman, M., Salamzadeh, A., & Rahaman, Md. S. (2023). ChatGPT and Academic Research: A Review and Recommendations Based on Practical Examples. 3, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v3i1.175
Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Joko, N. (2018). English Language Proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and Prospects. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 15(3), 618–629. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.4.618
Rizkiani, D., Mahdi, S., & Sujatna, E. T. S. (2022). Lexical Density and Readability of the Facil’s ‘Advanced Learning Textbook’ for Indonesian High School Students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1157
Sujatna, E. T. S., Emilia, E., & Kurniasih, N. (2022). Readability of PISA-like Reading Texts: A Lesson Learned from Indonesian Teachers. World Journal of English Language, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p9
Sujatna, E. T. S., Heriyanto, H., & Andri, S. (2021). Lexical Density and Variation in Indonesian Folklores in English Student Textbooks: An Sfl Study. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 15, 62. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v15i2.11102
Syarif, H. (2019, January 1). Lexical Density V.S. Grammatical Intricacy: How Are They Related? https://doi.org/10.2991/icoelt-18.2019.3
To, V., Fan, S., & Thomas, D. (2013). Lexical Density and Readability: A Case Study of English Textbooks. The International Journal of Language, Society and Culture.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v8i2.1546
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstracting and Indexing
Contact Us: IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics;
Address: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: ijeltalj@gmail.com