Analyzing Iago's Speech in Shakespeare's Othello

Nimer Abuzahra; Rami Salahat

doi:10.21093/ijeltal.v2i2.109

Analyzing Iago's Speech in Shakespeare's Othello

Nimer Abuzahra, Rami Salahat

Abstract

This paper aims to reveal and analyze Iago's speech in Shakespeare's Othello. Iago's use of animal metaphors in Othello is analyzed through Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). Moreover, Iago's words in the play are connected to race, gender and identity and analyzed through Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). Finally, Iago's rhetorical discourse is analyzed through Rhetorical Theory to examine his use of rhetorical devices such as rhetorical questions. The findings of this study show that Iago's use of animal metaphors in the play is to dehumanize and degrade other characters. Further, Iago is able to alienate Othello because of his different identity and different color from the Venetian society. What's more, Iago has shown misogynistic attitudes toward women through the course of the play. In addition, Iago shows an exceptional ability in his rhetoric. He manipulates most of the characters in the play and was able to deceive all of them. It can be concluded, then, that Iago's use of animal metaphors is conceptualized and connected to his cognitive mind. Moreover, Iago's racist language in the play reflects the racist attitudes toward 'non-white' people in Shakespeare's time. Finally, Iago uses different rhetorical techniques such as rhetorical questions to manipulate other characters which shows how language can be exploited to achieve negative impact on others.

Keywords

Othello, Iago, Speech, Moor, Venice

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abioye, T. (2011). Preference For Rhetorical Questions as an Index of Textual Message Effectiveness. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(11), 290-299.‏

Adelman, J. (1997). Iago's Alter Ego: Race as Projection in Othello. ShakespeareQuarterly, 48(2),125-144.‏

Baecker, D. L. (1999). Tracing the History of a Metaphor: All Is Not Black and White in Othello. Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 30(1).‏

Bate, Jonathan. (2010). Othello and the Other: Turning Turk: The subtleties of Shakespeare's treatment of Islam. The New York Times Literary Supplement, October 19, 2001. Web. 20 Dec. 2010.

Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. UK. Cambridge University Press.

Bowdle, B. F., &Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological review, 112(1), 193.

Braxton, P. N. (1990). Othello: the Moor and the metaphor. South Atlantic Review, 55(4),1-17.‏

Dictionary, O. E. (2003). Oxford English Dictionary.‏

Egan, G. (2007). Shakespeare. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis. In James, P. G & Michael, H (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 9-21). London and New York, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Fontecha, A. F., &Catalán, R. M. J. (2003). Semantic derogation in animal metaphor: a contrastive-cognitive analysis of two male/female examples in English and Spanish. Journal of pragmatics, 35(5), 771-797.‏

Gonzalez, A. G. (1985). The Infection and Spread of Evil: Some Major Patterns of Imagery and Language in" Othello". South Atlantic Review, 50(4), 35-49.‏

Hadfield, Andrew. (Ed.). (2005). William Shakespeare's Othello. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and & Francis Group.

Konigsberg, L. (2012). A jest's prosperity lies in the ear/Of him that hears it, never in the tongue/Of him that makes it (Doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.).

‏Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In Andrew, O (Ed.), Metaphor andThought (2nd., pp. 202- 251). UK. Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453-486.‏

Neill, M. (1989). Unproper Beds: Race, Adultery, and the Hideous in Othello. Shakespeare Quarterly, 40(4), 383-412.‏

Neill, M. (1998). " Mulattos,"" Blacks," and" Indian Moors": Othello and Early Modern Constructions of Human Difference. Shakespeare Quarterly, 49(4), 361-374.‏

Rand, F. P. (1950). The over garrulous Iago. Shakespeare Quarterly, 1(3), 155-161.‏

Reitz-Wilson, L. (2004). Race and Othello on Film. Comparative Literature and Culture, 6(1), 10.‏

Rohde, H. (2006). Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives. ‏Department of Linguistics, UCSD.‏

Rose, M. S. (2008). Race and Patriarchy in Othello. The International Journal of Bahamian Studies, 11, 25-33.‏

Roux, D. (2009). Hybridity, Othello and the postcolonial critics. Shakespeare in southern Africa, 21(1).‏

Shakespeare, W. (2003). Othello. Sander, N (Ed). UK. Cambridge University Press.

Sharma, B.(2015). Decoding Iago’s Villainy through his Discourse. International journal of English language, literature and humanities. Volume III. P.P: 661-672.

Silaški, N. (2014). Animal Metaphors and Semantic Derogation–Do Women Think Differently from Men?. Gender Studies, 12(1), 319-332.‏

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. The handbook of discourse analysis, 349-371.‏

Vitkus, D. J. (1997). Turning Turk in Othello: The Conversion and Damnation of the Moor. Shakespeare Quarterly, 48(2), 145-176.‏

Wilkinson, P. R. (2004). Thesaurus of traditional English metaphors.‏

Wodak, R., &Fairclough, N. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. Qualitative Research Practice: Concise Paperback Edition, 185-202.‏

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications Ltd: London.‏

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v2i2.109

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.