Students’ Perception Towards NNESTs & NESTs’ Teaching Styles: A study at State Islamic University of Ar-Raniry

Fadhlur Rahman, Ella Yuzar

Abstract


This paper aimed to investigate students' perspective towards their NESTs and NNESTs' teaching styles and students’ preferred teaching styles. The participants for this study were collected from fifty-two English Education students of State Islamic University of Ar-Raniry who had studied with both NEST and NNEST. Data were obtained from a combination of administering questionnaire and conducting two focus group interviews. The questionnaire as the research instrument was adopted from Grasha's (1996) Teaching Style Inventory. Interviews were conducted to gain more comprehensive information regarding students' perception of NEST and NNESTs’ teaching style and differences that students identified when leaning with NEST and NNEST. Using descriptive statistical analysis for the questionnaire and utilizing Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s (2014) approach for qualitative interview analysis, the study revealed that both NEST and NNEST were perceived to have personal model teaching style and interestingly, it is also the participant preferred style. It also presented that NESTs and NNESTs have their distinctive roles in teaching-learning that are complementary to create a successful learning environment. The current research has contributed to enrich the literature work in the discussion of how students perceive NEST and NNESTs’ teaching performance with implications for educational practitioners, stake holders and institutions.

Keywords


English language teaching, NEST, NNEST, students’ perception, teaching styles

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achimbe, E. (2006). The native speaker fever in English language teaching (ELT): Pitting pedagogical competence against historical origin, Linguistik Online, 26, 3-14.

Arvizu, M. N. G. (2014). Students' beliefs and expectations of Native and Non-Native English Teachers. MEXTESOL Journal, 38(3), 1-15. Available at: http://www.mextesol.net.

Butcher, C. (2005). The case against the native speaker. English Today, 21(2), 13-24.

Carless, D. R. (2006). Good practices in team teaching in Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 34, 350-351.

Chun, S., Y. (2014). EFL learners' beliefs about native and non-native English-speaking teachers: perceived strengths, weaknesses, and preferences. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(6), 563-579. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2014.889141

Cheung, Y. L., & Braine, G. (2007). The attitudes of university students onwards non-native speakers’ English teachers in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 38(3), 257-277.

Davies, A. (2006). The Native Speaker in Applied Linguistics. In Davies, A., and C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 431-450). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Díaz, N. R. (2015). Students’ preferences regarding native and non-native teachers of English at a university in the French Brittany. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 93-97.

Expat. (2019, September 20). English teacher Native speaker. https://www.expat.com/en/jobs/europe/russia/moscow/115-language-teacher/490658-english-teacher-native-speaker.html

Grasha, A.F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance Publishers.

Grasha, A. F., and Yangarber-Hicks, N. (2000). Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with instructional technology. College Teaching, 48(1), 2-11.

Gómez-Vásquez, L. Y., & Guerrero Nieto, C. H. (2018). Non-native English-speaking teachers’ subjectivities and Colombian language policies: A narrative study. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 20(2), 51-64.

González, A., & Llurda, E. (2016). Bilingualism and glo¬balisation in Latin America: Fertile ground for native-speakerism. In F. Copland, S. Garton, & S. Mann (Eds.), lets and nests: Voices, views and vignettes (pp. 90-109). London, uk: British Council.

Holliday, A. (2006). Native-speakerism. ELT Journal, 60(4), 385-387.

Howard, N. (2019). Constructing Professional Identities: Native English-Speaking Teachers in South Korea. The Qualitative Report, 24(7), 1478-1510. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss7/1

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.

Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J., M. (2005). What do students think about the pros and cons of having a native speaker teacher. In Llurda, E. (Ed.), Non-native language teachers: Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp. 217-241), New York: Springer.

Ma, L. P. F. (2012). Strengths and weaknesses of NESTS and NNESTs: Perceptions of NNESTs in Hong Kong. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 1-15.

Madrie, D. & Canado, M. P. (2004) Teacher and Student Preferences of Native and Nonnative Foreign Language Teachers. Porta Linguarum, 2, 125–138.

Mahboob, A. (2009). Racism in the English language teaching industry. Studies in applied linguistics and language learning, 27-37.

Mahboob, A. (Ed.). (2010). The NNEST lens: Non-native English speakers in TESOL. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Maum, R. (2004). A comparison of native-and Non-native English-speaking teachers' beliefs about teaching English as a second language to adult English language learners. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Louisville Adviser.

Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: Who’s worth more? ELT Journal, 46, 340–349. doi:10.1093/elt/46.4.340.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. ed: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Morgan, D. L. (2018). Basic and advanced focus groups. SAGE Publications.

Novianti, A. (2018). Native versus non-native english speaking teachers: an insight into Indonesian students’ voices. Jurnal Pendididkan Bahasa dan Sastra, 18(1), 44-57.doi: 10.17509/bs_jpbsp. v18i1.12145

Pennycook, A. (2017). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London, UK: Routledge.

Phillipson, R. (2012). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Rao, Z. (2010). Chinese students’ perceptions of native English-speaking teachers in EFL teaching. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 31(1), 55-68.

Ruecker, T. (2011). Challenging the native and non-native English speaker hierarchy in ELT: New directions from race theory. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 8(4), 400-422.

Ruecker, T., & Ives, L. (2015). White native English speakers needed: The rhetorical construction of privilege in online teacher recruitment spaces. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 733-756.

Schmitz, J. R. (2013). The native speaker and nonnative speaker debate: what are the issues and what are the outcomes? Calidoscópio, 11(2).

Shafie, M. S., & Alias, M. (2007). Hubungan Di antara Gaya Pembelajaran, Gaya Pengajaran dan Minat Terhadap Subjek Kejuruteraan. Jurnal Sains Sosial, 4(1), 19-40.

Singh, S., Singh, S., & Gautam, S. (2009). Teaching Styles and Approaches: Medical Students Perceptions of Animation-Based Lectures as A Pedagogical Innovation. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 5(1).

Tjokrokanoko, A., & Tedjasuksmana, H. (2013). EFL Secondary Students’ Perceptions on Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Teachers. Beyond Words, 1(1), 138-169.

Walkinshaw, I. (2012) Native- and Non-Native Speaking English Teachers in Vietnam: Weighing the Benefits. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language. 16(3), 10-12.

Walkinshaw, I., & Oanh, D. H. (2014). Native and non-native English language teachers: Student perceptions in Vietnam and Japan. Sage Open, 4(2), 2158244014534451.

Yakoub, E. (2011). Attitudes of Jordanian graduate students and teachers towards native and non-native English language teachers. Unpublished MA Thesis, Mno.dle East University, Jordan.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i2.516

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Creative Commons License
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 

Abstracting and Indexing

                  



Contact Us: IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics; Address: FTIK, IAIN Samarinda; Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: ijeltalj@gmail.com