English Vocabulary Size of Indonesian High School Graduates: Curriculum Expectation and Reality

Faisal Mustafa

doi:10.21093/ijeltal.v3i2.278

English Vocabulary Size of Indonesian High School Graduates: Curriculum Expectation and Reality

Faisal Mustafa

Abstract

Vocabulary is most important in learning a language, and thus it should be taught before teaching other language skills. Teachers need to plan which words to teach to make students learn vocabulary easier; however, Indonesian high school curriculum does not specify which vocabulary to teach. Therefore, this research was aimed at finding out the list of vocabulary required by the curriculum of junior and senior high schools in Indonesia and whether they have learned those words after graduating high school levels. Vocabulary used in texts in the national examinations is interpreted as the curriculum-expected vocabulary; therefore, the data for curriculum expectation were collected from previous national examinations. The vocabulary was classified based on most-frequently used vocabulary provided by Nation (2006) with 14,000 word-families categorized into 14 levels. Only the first 5 levels (1st - 5th 1,000) were used in this research. Later, 1,775 high school fresh graduates were tested with this vocabulary to predict the percentage of the vocabulary they have learned. The results showed that the expected vocabulary size of junior high school graduates was the 1st 2,000 words and the 1st 3,000 words for senior high school graduates. Compared to the graduate predicted vocabulary size, they only had 72% vocabulary in the 1st 1,000, 54% in the 2nd 1,000, 49% in the 3rd. These results suggest that the graduate vocabulary size has not satisfied the curriculum expectation; therefore, Indonesian high school students should be taught all words in the first 3,000 list to be able to comprehend texts in the national examination.

Keywords

expected vocabulary, Indonesian high school curriculum, Indonesian high school students, vocabulary size, vocabulary test

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, K. I., Puteh, F., Azizan, A. R., Hamdan, N. N., & Saude, S. (2013). Validation of a controlled productive Vocabulary Levels Test below the 2000-word level. System, 41(2), 352–364. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.005

American Classical League. (1933). Methods in teaching Latin. Natin Notes, 10(5), 2–3.

Ariza, W. F., & Munir, A. (2014). Focus on form in 2013 junior high school curriculum. Retain, 1, 1–6.

Athiyah, C. N. U. (2015). Pendekatan saintifik pada pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Madrasah Tsanawiyah [Scientific approach in teaching English at Islamic junior high school]. Retrieved March 26, 2017, from http://pta.kemenag.go.id/index.php/frontend/news/index/245

Bal-Gezegin, B. (2014). An investigation of using video vs. audio for teaching vocabulary. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 450–457. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.516

Blasco, M. E. (2015). A cognitive linguistic analysis of the cooking domain and its implementation in the EFL classroom as a way of enhancing effective vocabulary teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 178, 70–77. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.149

Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D. (2015). Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt018

Carey, S. S. (2011). A beginner’s guide to scientific method (4th editio). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

Çiftçi, H., & Üster, S. (2009). A comparative analysis of teaching vocabulary in context and by definition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1568–1572. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.275

Cobb, T. (2007). Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 38–63.

Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Demircioǧlu, Ş. (2010). Teaching English vocabulary to young learners via drama. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 439–443. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.039

Dilek, Y., & Yürük, N. (2013). Using semantic mapping technique in vocabulary teaching at pre-intermediate level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1531–1544. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.221

Fidel, R. (1991). Searchers’ selection of search keys: III. Searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(7), 515–527. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199108)42:7<515::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-F

Gorjian, B. (2012). Teaching vocabulary through web-based language learning (WBLL) approach. Procedia Technology, 1, 334–339. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.070

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

Inal, H., & Cakir, A. (2014). Story-based vocabulary teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 675–679. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.467

Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture. Decree of Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture, Pub. L. No. 65 of 2013 (2013). Indonesia.

Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture. (2014). Materi pelatihan guru implementasi kurikulum 2013 tahun ajaran 2014/2015 [Teaching material on the implementation of Curriculum 2013 for teachers in the academic year of 2014/2015]. Jakarta: Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture.

Jaedun, A., Hariyanto, V. L., & Nuryadin. (2014). An evaluation of the implementation of Curriculum 2013 at the building construction department of vocational high schools in Yogyakarta. Journal of Education, 7(1), 14–22.

Kamil, M. L., & Hiebert, E. H. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary: Perspectives and persistent issues. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)90065-5

Katwibun, H. (2014). Using an interactive whiteboard in vocabulary teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2005), 674–678. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.278

Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Laurén & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special Language: From Humans to Thinking Machines (pp. 316–323). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Laufer, B. (2001). Reading, word-focused activities and incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Prospect, 16(3), 44–54.

Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33–51.

Lessard-Clouston, M. (2013). Word lists for vocabulary learning and teaching. The CATESOL Journal, 24(1), 287–304.

McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Muddamalle, M. R. (1998). Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval: A case study in soil mechanics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(10), 881–887. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199808)49:10<881::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-M

Mustafa, F. (2018). How much do high schools contribute to improving students’ English proficiency? Seeking alumni’s perception in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal, 20(2), 49–61.

Nation, I. S. P. (2014). How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words? Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(2), 1–16. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2014/

Nation, P. (2004). A study of the most frequent word families in the British National Corpus. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection, Acquisition and Testing (pp. 3–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nation, P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. http://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59

Nation, P. (2013). Vocabulary size in a second language. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 6674–6677). Wiley-Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1270

Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.

Nation, P., & Mara, P. (2002). Vocabulary. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An Introduction to Applied Linguistics (pp. 35–54). New York: Routledge.

Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nemati, A., & Maleki, E. (2014). The effect of teaching vocabulary through the diglot –weave technique on vocabulary learning of Iranian high school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1340–1345. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.551

Okamoto, M. (2015). Is corpus word frequency a good yardstick for selecting words to teach? Threshold levels for vocabulary selection. System, 51, 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.03.004

Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2013). Vocabulary and reading. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1267

Primativo, S., Rinaldi, P., O’Brien, S., Paizi, D., Arduino, L. S., & Burani, C. (2013). Bilingual vocabulary size and lexical reading in Italian. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 554–562. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.011

Putri, M. A., & Komariah, E. (2018). A content analysis of activities in English textbook “When English Rings a Bell.” Research in English and Education, 3(2), 147–153. http://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1403255T

Rusanganwa, J. (2013). Multimedia as a means to enhance teaching technical vocabulary to physics undergraduates in Rwanda. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 36–44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.07.002

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sen, Y., & Kuleli, M. (2015). The Effect of Vocabulary Size and Vocabulary Depth on Reading in EFL Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 555–562. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.546

Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. http://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975

Sundayana, W. (2015). Readiness and competence of senior high school English teachers to implement Curriculum 2013. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 29–36.

Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592

Tsuchiya, K. (1975). The Taman Siswa Movement: Its early eight years and Javanese background. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 6(1), 61–86. http://doi.org/10.2307/20070134

Vela, V., & Rushidi, J. (2016). The effect of keeping vocabulary notebooks on vocabulary acquisition and learner autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 201–208. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.046

Wang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.013

Wasik, B. A., Hindman, A. H., & Snell, E. K. (2016). Book reading and vocabulary development: A systematic review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 37, 39–57. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.04.003

West, M. P. (1953). A general service list of English words: with semantic frequencies and a supplementary word-list for the writing of popular science and technology. Longmans, Green. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=1MJZAAAAMAAJ

Zaim, M. (2017). Implementing scientific approach to teach English at senior high school in Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 13(2), 33–40. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n2p33

Zhang, L. J., & Anual, S. Bin. (2008). The role of vocabulary in reading comprehension: The case of secondary school students learning English in Singapore. RELC Journal, 39(1), 51–76. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208091140

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v3i2.278

Refbacks

IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.