Situational Willingness to Communicate in English: Voices from Indonesian Non-English Major University Students

Adaninggar Septi Subekti


This study investigated the perspectives of Indonesian non-English major university students on factors that could affect their Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in English as a situational affective construct affected by various surrounding factors. Involving seven university student participants from three categories of WTC level (low, medium, and high) in individual semi-structured interviews, the study found seven emerging themes through Thematic Analysis. First, supportive peers were attributed to higher WTC and unsupportive peers to lower WTC. Second, learners, especially those with low WTC, reported higher WTC when they were among classmates they already know. Third, learners reported higher WTC when they perceived their teachers as caring, patient, and supportive, showing empathy of learners’ struggle. Fourth, learners who perceived themselves as having low self-perceived communication competence (SPCC) would likely have less WTC. Fifth and sixth, learners had higher WTC when they were to speak among few interlocutors and were given some time to prepare for their talking. These two were found especially among learners with low WTC. Seventh, learners with medium and high WTC was found to have pleasant and successful previous experiences in using English whilst those with low WTC reported upsetting experiences with the language. Based on the findings, pedagogical implications and suggestions for future studies were presented.


Affective Construct, English as Foreign Language (EFL), Self-perceived communication competence (SPCC), Situational Willingness to Communicate (WTC), Thematic Analysis

Full Text:



Amiryousefi, M. (2016). Willingness to communicate, interest, motives to communicate with the instructor, and L2 speaking: A focus on the role of age and gender. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, (April).

Baghaei, P. (2011). Validation of a multidimensional scale of willingness to communicate. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Methodology and Evaluation Section of the German Association of Psychology. Sep, 21-23, Bamberg, Germany.

Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50(2), 65–96.

Barjesteh, H., Vaseghi, R., & Neissi, S. (2012). Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate across different context- and receiver types. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 47–54.

Bernales, C. (2016). Towards a comprehensive concept of willingness to communicate: Learners’ predicted and self-reported participation in the foreign language classroom. System, 56(2016), 1–12.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468–479.

Cao, Y. (2013). Exploring dynamism in willingness to communicate: A longitudinal case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 160–176.

Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493.

Clement, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 190–209.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Denies, K., Yashima, T., & Janssen, R. (2015). Classroom versus societal willingness to communicate: Investigating French as a second language in Flanders. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 718–739.

Dewaele, J., & Dewaele, L. (2018). Learner-internal and learner-external predictors of willingness to communicate in the FL classroom. Journal of European Second Language Association, X(X), 1–14.

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Fadilah, E. (2018). Perception, motivation, and communicative self-confidence of Indonesian students on willingness to communicate in L2 using Facebook. JEELS, 5(1), 23–48.

Gallagher, H. . (2018). Social Networks and the willingness to communicate: Reciprocity and brokerage. Journal of Languageand Social Psychology, 0(0), 1–21.

Grant, S. (2018). Effects of intensive EFL immersion programmes on willingness to communicate. The Language Learning Journal, 1–12.

Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world (3rd Editio). London: Sage Publications, Ltd.

Jamshidnejad, A. (2010). The construction of oral problems in an EFL context: An innovative approach. Studies in Litarature and Language, 1(6), 8–22.

Joe, H. K., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53(2017), 133–144.

Kachru, Y., & Nelson, C. L. (2006). World Englishes in Asian Contexts. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Kang, D. (2014). The effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate, speaking abilities, and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319–332.

Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33, 277–292.

Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., & Barabadi, E. (2017). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in Second Language Acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. S0272263117000304

MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576.

MacIntyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A. (2011). Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion students’ willingness to communicate. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 81–96.

MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.

McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self- perceived communication competence: Conceptualizations and perspectives. In J. Daly, J. McCroskey, T. Ayres, T. Hopf, & D. Ayres (Eds.), Avoiding Communication: Shyness, Reticence, and Communication Apprehension (pp. 75–108). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1–9.

Ningsih, S. K., Narahara, S., & Mulyono, H. (2018). An exploration of factors contributing to student’ unwillingness to communicate in a foreign language across Indonesian secondary schools. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 811–824.

Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. J. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876.

Rolin-Ianziti, J., & Varshney, R. (2008). Students’ views regarding the use of the first language: An exploratory study in a tertiary context maximizing target language use. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(2), 249–273.

Sa’adah, L., Nurkamto, J., & Suparno, S. (2018). Oral corrective feedback: Exploring the relationship between teacher’s strategy and students’ willingness to communicate. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 240–252.

Saint Leger, S., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269–285.

Shahbaz, M., Khan, M. S., Khan, R. R. M. I., & Ghulam, M. (2016). Role of self-perceived communication competence and communication apprehension for willingness to communicate in L1 and L2. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(1), 158–166.

Subekti, A. S. (2018a). An exploration of foreign language anxiety in the Indonesian university context: Learners’ and teachers’ voices. TEFLIN Journal, 29(2), 219–244.

Subekti, A. S. (2018b). Investigating the relationship between foreign language anxiety and oral performance of non-English major university students in Indonesia. Dinamika Ilmu, 18(1), 15–35.

Subekti, A. S. (2019). Willingness to communicate in English of non-English major university students in Indonesia. Lingua Cultura, 13(1), 55–66.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2013). A Vigotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 101–129.

Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualisation of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 16(1), 18–38.

Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners’ willingness to communicate. System, 42, 288–295.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Abstracting and Indexing


Contact Us: IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics; Address: FTIK, IAIN Samarinda; Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: