A Metafunction Analysis of Conjunction System in the Opinion Forum of the Jakarta Post Daily Newspaper

Pikir Wisnu Wijayanto


The study aims at finding the meaning of the texts or sentences in detail from the discourse semantics’ perspectives through metafunctions analysis of conjunction systems introduced by Martin and Rose (2003: 110). This study used qualitative and descriptive methods. The data used in this study is taken from the top three most shared articles by the readers in the "Opinion Forum" of the Jakarta Post in January 2019. They are entitled “Free Ba’asyir? Why now?” by the Editorial Board of Jakarta Post, “Our double standards on Jerusalem and Ba’asyir” by Kornelius Purba, and “Questioning early release of Ba'asyir” by Carrisa Tehputri. The researcher assesses the extent of utilization of conjunctions in the text by using the four kinds of logic for the conjunction types; addition, comparison, time, and consequence. Based on the analysis of conjunction systems, the article uses four logics of conjunctions both external and internal conjunctions as a logical connection between phrases, clauses, or idioms. First, the three articles used conjunctions to add the meaning of information and become a set of means for adjusting expectations are continuatives. Second, the conjunctions logic used as a comparison that expressed the meaning of similarity and contrast in order to compare or contrast arguments when countering an expectation that the authors have created for the reader. Third, the articles used the conjunctions to express the successive meaning and simultaneous meaning in order to add the information when sequencing events and looking at interconnections between processes. In short, those conjunctions are used to relate activities in sequences and to organize arguments. The last logic conjunctions used in those articles are the consequence with cause, purpose, and condition meaning in order to add the information when giving cause and effect.


conjunction system, Jakarta Post, metafunction analysis

Full Text:



Ahangar, A., Taki, G., & Rahimi, M. (2012). The Use of Conjunctions as Cohesive Devices in Iranian Sport Live Radio and TV Talks. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 9(2), 56-72.

Al-Khalidy, H. O. (2018). The Use of Conjunctions as Grammatical Cohesion in the Speeches of Her Majesty Queen Rania of Jordan. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(5):207-211.

Banks, D. (2002). Systemic Functional Linguistics as a model for text analysis. Asp Journal, 35(36), 23-34.

Centonze, L. (2013). Conjunctions in ELF Academic Discourse: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Lingue e Linguaggi, 10(1), 7-18.

De Oliveira, L. (2015). A Systemic-Functional Analysis of English Language Learners' Writing. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada Journal, 31(1), 207-237.

Editorial Board. (2019). “Free Ba’asyir? Why now?” The Jakarta Post, January 21, 2019. https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2019/01/21/free-baasyir-why-now.html (accessed January 23, 20159).

Gleason, H. A., Jr. (1968). Contrastive analysis in discourse structure. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 21. Washington, DC: Georgetown University (Georgetown University Institute of Languages and Linguistics).

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hasselgård, H. 2014. Additive Conjunction Across Languages: ‘Dessuten’ and its correspondences in English and French. Oslo Studies in Language, 6(1), 69–89.

Ismali, H. M. (2012). Discourse Markers in Political Speeches: Forms and Functions Journal of College of Education for Women, 23(4), 1260-1278.

Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage Publications.

Kailani, A. (2017). Systemic Functional Linguistics Analysis of Cohesion and Coherence in Written Nursing Care Reports. International Journal of Educational Best Practices (IJEBP), 1(2): 1-23.

Kusumawardhani, P. (2017). The Analysis of Conjunctions in Writing an English Narrative Composition: A Syntax Perspective. Wanastra: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra. Linguistic, Literature, Teaching, and English Specific for Purposes, 9(1), 1-7.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.

Purba, K. (2019). “Our double standards on Jerusalem and Ba’asyir” The Jakarta Post, January 23, 2019. https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2019/01/23/our-double-standards-on-jerusalem-and-baasyir.html (accessed January 23, 2019).

Syukri, S., & Humaerah, I. (2015). Discourse as Social Practice on Abdul Qodir Jaelani (AQJ) Case. Journal of English Language and Education, 1(2), 170-183.

Tehputri, C. (2019). “Questioning early release of Ba'asyir” The Jakarta Post, January 22, 2019. https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2019/01/22/questioning-early-release-of-baasyir.html (accessed January 23, 2019).

Wang, S. (2016). Conjunction is more than just a Grammatical Resource: A Comparative Study of Conjunctions in U.S. and Chinese Mathematics Lessons. Dissertation. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Wijayanto, P. W. (2016). Appraisal System on the Jakarta Post Opinion “A Human Rights Memorial: Jokowi and the Sorcerer’s Stone”. Vision Journal, 5(1): 169-188.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v3i2.199


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) by http://ijeltal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Abstracting and Indexing


Contact Us: IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics; Address: FTIK, IAIN Samarinda; Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: ijeltalj@gmail.com